Kanye West vs. Nirvana Cover Art
Monday, October 18 2010 7:21 PM EST | Posted by: B.Dot | Posted in: Blog, True Story
Kanye isn’t letting up. After posting a pic of his banned cover art yesterday, he questioned why Nirvana’s sophomore set was approved for retail and his isn’t. Smells like adult bullshit. In any event, My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy drops November 22nd.





Disrespectful views at Tha Kang, T.I.? Nah, Ms. Banks you're out of line. Yeah Harris' Aussie ain't that dope but neither are you. I just saw you at Coachella and I wasn't impressed. You got the look, the swag, the tough talk but where are the tunes? "212" is alright but that's where it stops. According to Jay-Z's old board rules: You have no right to diss Tip. Look in the mirror and ask yourself: How many classic albums have you created? Are you on anyone's top 10 MCs list? Do you have any hardware on your walls, ma? Cliff is right. Keep him out of the girlfight. You're heavy in these tweets, but I hope you're finding time to create music that backs up your buzz. Or you'll soon be begone like Kreayshawn. You young ladies today bore me. *Turns up Mia X CD* No Limit forever!
The best things in life are free, but hopping on Hov's press conference stage uninvited is gon cost cha. Whatcha did was wrong! ⎯B.Dot
When it comes to Hip-Hop of course people is quick to do something about it. And how can Nirvana have another album coming out when the lead singer killed himself 16 years ago?
Im slappin the banned cover on my album and callin that shit special edition. Fuck a hater.
The image on Kanye’s cover had pornographic connotations, that’s why it was banned. What’s so hard to see about that? Not that I agree that it should’ve been banned, coz I don’t, But thats why it was.
the man makes a very valid part.
well, you know censorship in hip hop is rampant these days. i say, fight the power.
cuz THAT shit above is waaaay more disturbing than kanye’s cover. wtf?
It has a lot to do with race. Thats all.
so Kanye equates a naked child to a a black beast fucking a white pheonix w/ a beer car w/ a nipple showing. the cover is dope, but kanye is a pretentious loser who should stop calling himself a “genius”.
@Ace That may be true but kanye’s album art really wasn’t within the guidelines and this one isn’t either @Yooo even if it’s no pornographic. It’s showing a baby’s private parts. That can’t be right
Sorry Ye. I think tha cover is artistically dope, but it’s not tha same. A naked baby is offensive 2 ppl. A nigga wit a beer, and a WHITE woman with no arms, a polka dot tail, and a titty out, humpin his thigh IS. Lol. It’s fucked up, but times have changed. Can’t pull tha race card on this one.
Btw if you think this is a dope cover you’re a pedophile
Thank Me Hater, are you fucking serious. Its a fucking baby, you idiot. There’s a difference between an ADULT showing their dick and a baby showing their dick. Wow what the fuck, why are people stupid?
1st, Kanye’s album cover was not banned. 2nd, be for real. It is not hard to see why Nirvana cover would not be rejected by a retailer like WalMart, while they would balk at Ye’s. It’s not a rap/rock, or black/white thing. It’s too graphic and we all know it. So does Kanye but he’s doing this to keep people talking. Fun! But not a conspiracy.
Kanye is such a pretentious ass. Nevermore was released how many years ago? and there’s nothing artistic about that try hard ass album cover he wants to use. He needs to stop trying to be controversial and release some decent music and not all these wack ass random collabos.
DIS SHIT IS SOOO FUCKIN STUPID, but yall aint gotta worry we gon see tht bear
Lol thats Kanye for ya!
For music production and free beats, hit us up at http://www.themusicmajors.com
Deuces!
~Mr. Official
Actually, when Nirvana’s album originally came out the label slapped a sticker over the babys dick on the packaging, so you couldn’t see it on the store shelves.
Kurt later said, (im paraphrasing) “if you are offended by this picture, you are a closet pedophile”
Just put a random naked chick on the cover with parental stickers on her body and be done with it.
The difference is that album came out almost 20 years ago. Into today’s music industry iTunes, Walmart and Best Buy sell the overwhelming majority of music in the US so if just one of those outlets refuses to sell your album for whatever reason it’s gonna have a major impact on your sells. I know Yezzy may not care about sales but I’m sure the good people over at Def Jam do. Back when Nirvana dropped “Nevermind” there were a lot more independent record stores so artist didn’t have compromise there art because one cooperation didn’t like it.
Times have changed when was Nirvanas CD released? Mid 90′s I’m sure I don’t even remember wal-mart being around back then. People start pulling out the race card too soon these days. That picture would be offensive to most anyway so walmart has to be politically correct. You got a white she devil “phoenix” hovering over a nude kanye holding some alcoholic beverage. it does look dope in the artistic sense of it but c’mon its not like he didn’t know that would happen. I say make it a pull out cover or something clever so it won’t be as offensive while on store shelves.
kanye kind of lied bc his label accepted it but they strongly urged him to change it so it could sell at bestbuy/walmart etc
These covers aint shit Expand Your music Go look at 1960′s 70′ Prog Rock covers by Roger Dean and be amazed google it
I meant to say a naked baby ISN’T offensive. My bad. Lol.
@supppppppp cosign
Its bullshit. All they gotta do is find a creative way to package it with the artwork covered & slap that parental advisory sticker on the front Problem SOLVED.
“i dont even remember wal-mart being around back then.”
SMH
Difference is? People on Kanye’s record are fucking
Nirvana’s point was money is becoming more and more far reaching, with the baby jumping in the water almost killing itself for it being an hyperbolic example
Kanye is just being provocative for the sake of being so. But I do like the cover and think he should keep it. But still, there’s a huge difference.
teejay is right
Well kids not to mention, this was back in the early early 90s when no one really gave a shit about album covers. Huge huge huge difference between a naked baby, and Kanye’s Ridiculous excuse for an album cover.
Nevermind = Naked baby
Kanye’s album cover = Sex, alcohol, etc. Everything that would offend the public.
The public would rather stare at a naked baby, nothing gross, nasty, offensive about it. You’re not a “pedophile” for liking the above album cover. Dumbasses. And another thing people see naked babies on a daily basis.
Ye, nigga you stupid..
Not in San Diego atleast all we had was target kmart and a few other retailers. And about the Nirvana cover there was naked babies everywhere back then in commercials and ads I’m sure. Too many sick fucks have come out and been caught so people have become more protective of there images. If someone tried to pull the sameshit these days they would get the same treatment kanyes cover is getting.
Dope post family!!
It really has nothing to do with whether you personally think the Nirvana or Kanye artwork is good or not the bottom line here(and Kanye’s main point) is retailers shouldn’t have an say in what artist do. If Def Jam or Universal Music Group as a whole would just stand up to Walmart or whoever and say “Ether you sell the album the way it is or we’ll pull all of our records from your store” they would back down. I understand that would never happen in a million years but the only way for artist to have any power in situations like this would be if the record label backs them up….which they won’t of course because it’s much easier to get Kanye to change his album cover.
Um because Nirvana is GREAT! lol It’s cause it’s a baby they show naked babies on commercials so it’s not really a problem. I don’t really care for the cover that Ye want to us but they should let Kanye have the cover he wants, it is his cd after all.
That was 20 years ago lil buddy, The country is alot more uptight now
Back then you could also get a hardcore record like Wu Tang or Mobb Deep on Rap Radio stations too, now they wont play you unless your music is softer then baby shit, alot has changes since then
@ Kofi
LOL, dont make me laugh about “Make Wal Mart Back Down”…………You wanna know what would happen if they tried that, I’ll tell you
“Hey Wal Mart, this is the artwork, take it or leave it” – Def Jam
“Leave it. Next” – Wal Mart
Wal Mart dont have to back down to a fuckin record company, they’ll laugh in your face
This is just Kanye trying to hard to be different.
I mean maybe his label doesn’t like it because its fukin wack? Millions is spent marketing and that’s the best this fruitcake can come up with? I mean yes he’s a dope artist (musically) but he does take this outlandish shit far too serious.
I actually thought the cover was a joke at first but this crazy fucker’s actually trying to get this made. Before one of his stans says it’s artistic, sit the fuck down. Y’all know that covers straight doody.
Nigga needs to bring the bear back.
I usually ride w/ Kanye but on this one? I can’t agree. A naked baby (innocence) is far more acceptable than a naked beast bangin’ out a “phoenix” – besides, when Nirvana released that album, it was what … 1991? There were no Walmarts to worry about.
Kanye really don’t have a point, but at the same time he does raise an interesting question. What the fuck is the difference, really, between a cover with a monster fucking, or watching The Jersey Shore in the middle of the afternoon with real people fucking? Either that, or just paint the bitch black instead of white, case would be closed.
kanye’s cover is more like porno, thats why.
Its not a valid point. Nirvanas cover is not sexual at all. Kanye’s on the other hand is explicit. Just have a nude drawing of his phoenix and he will b cool
The Nirvana cover is like CHILD PORNO dumbshits ya’ll rather see a baby dick? Niggas have fallen…
it has nothing to do with both covers beeing different …
Alot of things changed and not for the better ! That baby cover would be banned as well today
same goes for covers with guns etc …
smh.
Kanye’s was banned just cuz he a rapper. This won’t be banned cuz they a rock band. Which is sad cuz if u ask me this is a lot worse.
that nirvana cover is kiddie porn
Lmao @ Drucifer…This nigga said softer than baby shit lmao that was a good one
But nah, Kanye just creating some buzz through controversy come on guys. This is what they teach you in “How To Create a Buzz as a Hip Hop artist in 2010 – 101″ full list is
1. Create a twitter account (Tweet actively!)
2. Beef with an opposing artist (preferably the hottest one at the moment)
3. If beef is not taken seriously, rebuke all claims you were serious about the situation
4. Collab with the hottest artist
5. Stock your album to the brim with the hottest artist
6. Go to jail (See Index under “T.I”)
7. Feature Drake or Nicki Minaj on your record
8. Award show coming up? So something outrageous
9. “Leak” a few songs
10. If all else fails, try making a good song…this is the backup plan if all else fails though.
kanye your album cover is worse then this lol thats why..plus being black and a hip hop artist is another factor
@Drucifer
I wasn’t talking about just Def Jam dummy I was talking about the parent company Universal Music Group which is a gigantic corporation that erns Walmart millions a year…..like I said that scenario would never happen I was just giving an example of what it would take for things to change.
I don’t know why its banned kanye probably because its interacial demon sex.
I still don’t understand why he wants “a monster with no arms and a polka dot tail and wings” as his album cover..its even more dumb when its described that way!..no hate tho..the album will be hot regardless
@ word lol co-sign
@ Kofi
All good homie, just sounded funny to me, no hate
OMG YOU PPL ARE IDIOTS!!! HE IS OBVIOUSLY JOKING!!!! SMH